Selasa, 14 Juni 2016



            What is forensic linguistics?



In ten words or less, what is Forensic Linguistics? Forensic Linguistics is the application of linguistics to legal issues. That is a starting point, but like all answers it is imperfect and serves only to stimulate more questions. For example, what does ‘the application of linguistics’ mean?
When Forensic Linguistics is referred to as an application of linguistics or, more concisely, an applied linguistic science, the word applied is not necessarily being used in the same sense as, for example, in the phrase applied statistics, where what is being applied is a theory underpinning a particular science to the practice of that science. Forensic Linguistics is, rather, the application of linguistic knowledge to a particular social setting, namely the legal forum (from which the word forensic is derived). In its broadest sense we may say that Forensic Linguistics is the interface between language, crime and law, where law includes law enforcement, judicial matters, legislation, disputes or proceedings in law, and even disputes which only potentially involve some infraction of the law or some necessity to seek a legal remedy. Given the centrality of the use of language to life in general and the law in particular, it is perhaps somewhat surprising that Forensic Linguistics is a relative newcomer to the arena, whereas other disciplines, such as fingerprint identification and shoeprint analysis, are much older, having a well‑established presence in judicial processes.


The application of linguistic methods to legal questions is only one sense in which Forensic Linguistics is an application of a science, in that various linguistic theories may be applied to the analysis of the language samples in an inquiry. Thus, the forensic linguist may quote observations from research undertaken in fields as diverse as language and memory studies, Conversation Analysis, Discourse Analysis, theory of grammar, Cognitive Linguistics, Speech Act Theory, etc. The reason for this reliance on a broad spectrum of linguistic fields is understandable: the data the linguist receives for analysis may require that something is said about how the average person remembers language, how conversations are constructed, the kinds of moves speakers or writers make in the course of a conversation or a written text, or they may need to explain to a court some aspects of phrase or sentence structure.



In summary, we can say that the forensic linguist applies linguistic knowledge and techniques to the language implicated in (i) legal cases or proceedings or (ii) private disputes between parties which may at a later stage result in legal action of some kind being taken.




                      Legal Cases and Proceedings


In lay terms, for the purposes of this discussion, we can envisage a legal proceeding as consisting potentially of three stages: the investigative stage, the trial stage and the appeal stage. The investigative stage is also sometimes referred to as the intelligence stage. In this part of the process it is important to gather information relating to the (alleged) crime. Not all of the information which is gathered during investigations can be used in court, and so a linguist who assists law enforcement officers during the intelligence stage may, in fact, find that there is no requirement to give evidence at any subsequent trial. Similarly, a linguist whose work is used at trial may not be required to assist the court at the appeal stage, if the content of the appeal does not include linguistic questions. On the other hand if linguistic evidence which was not available at the earlier stages comes to light while the appeal is being prepared, then this may be the stage at which the linguist is called in to give an opinion.

                   The investigative stage


Typically, requests for linguistic analysis originate with law enforcement departments or, in some countries, at the invitation of an investigating magistrate. Examples of linguistics intelligence work have included analysis of ransom notes, letters purporting to provide information on a case, mobile (cell) phone text messages, and specific threat letters. Linguists have also been asked to analyse texts purporting to be suicide notes. Even though the police in such cases may not suspect foul play,  it could be important to attempt to establish whether the questioned text can throw any light on the cause or circumstances of death.
Also at the investigative stage, the police may need to have an opinion on a text or an interview tape, perhaps to assist in developing interview and interrogation strategies. It is unlikely that anything a linguist says about veracity (using techniques similar to statement analysis) would be acceptable evidence in court, which is why this kind of linguistic analysis is usually confined to the investigative stage.

             The trial stage


At the trial stage any one of a number of types of linguistic analysis may be called for, including questions of authorship (Who wrote the text?/Who is the speaker in this recording?), meaning and interpretation (Does this word mean x, y or something else?),  threat analysis (Does the text contain a threat?), or text provenance and construction (Was the text dual‑authored? Was it written rather than spoken? etc). The inquiry could be of a civil or criminal nature, and this will determine the level of ‘proof’ acceptable to the court in question. Usually, the forensic linguist is instructed some time before a case gets to court. An expert report is submitted to the instructing legal team — either for the prosecution or the defence (or the plaintiff/claimant in a civil case). Even though the linguist prepares a report for one ‘side’ in a case rather than the other, it is the court for whom the work is really done. The first duty of the linguist — like that of any other forensic expert — is to the court, and not to the client on whose behalf the analysis was originally carried out.

                      The appeal stage


If a defendant is convicted of a crime it is not uncommon, especially these days, for the defence legal team to launch an appeal almost immediately. The structure and nature of appeals varies from country to country, and in some countries appeals centre on the claim that new evidence has been made available, or that existing evidence should be looked at in new ways. It is becoming increasingly common for linguists to be called in to assist legal counsel at the appeal stage, either because there may be some dispute about the wording, interpretation or authorship of a statement or confession made to police, or because a new interpretation of a forensic text (such as a suicide or ransom note) may have become apparent since the conviction.

                    Private disputes


A not inconsiderable part of the forensic linguist’s work consists of private cases. By this is meant that the work is commissioned by private individuals not involved in litigation at the time of the commission. Such cases include identifying the author of anonymous hate mail, the investigation of plagiarism for a school or university, or on behalf of a student accused of plagiarism. It sometimes happens that the linguist’s report may have an influence on the client’s decision to take matters further, either in a civil or a criminal court, but this is not common. Usually, what happens is that the report is submitted and the client deals with the matter internally — either within a university department, a business organisation, or, as may also be the case, within a family.



https://www.google.com/search?q=forensik+linguistics&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=fflb&biw=1024&bih=610&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiT_6qNkKfNAhWFn5QKHSNqAnEQ_AUIBygA&dpr=1




thesis yang bersangkutan dengan lexicology





my book



Assalamualaikum wr wb..
Hai teman teman,,kali ini saya akan memposting sebuah gambar buku.. buku itulah yang saya pakai untuk mempelajari tentang introduction to linguistics..buku ini sangat bagus untuk mempelajari linguistics,karna di buku  ini lengkap sekali bagian bagian dari linguistic dan cocok untuk anda yang sedang mempelajari linguistics..
Inilah dia… 


dari buku inilah saya mendapat banyak sekali pelajaran tentang linguistics dan saya harap buku ini juga dapat membantu anda semuanya.. karna dari buku ini telah terdapat referensi yang jelas dan tidak rancu jika kita menggunakan nya..
semoga teman teman semua yang sedang mencari buku ini secepatnya dapat menemukannya yaa…
thanks for your attention.. J
wassalamualaikum wr wb..

Selasa, 17 Mei 2016

Semantics




  

SEMANTICS
Semantics is the study of the meaning of linguistic expressions.


Seven Types of Meaning
A piece of language conveys its dictionary meaning, connotations beyond the dictionary meaning, information about the social context of language use, speaker’s feelings and attitudes rubbing off of one meaning on the another meaning of the same word when it has two meanings and meaning because of habit occurrence.
Broadly speaking, ‘meaning’ means the sum total of communicated through language. Words, Phrases and sentences have meanings which are studies in semantics.
Geoffrey Leech in his ‘Semantic- A Study of meaning’ (1974) breaks down meaning into seven types or ingredients giving primacy to conceptual meaning.
The Seven types of meaning according to Leech are as follows.



1) Conceptual or Denotative Meaning:
Conceptual meaning is also called logical or cognitive meaning. It is the basic propositional meaning which corresponds to the primary dictionary definition. Such a meaning is stylistically neutral and objective as opposed to other kinds of associative meanings. Conceptual
Meanings are the essential or core meaning while other six types are the peripheral. It is peripheral in as sense that it is non-essential. They are stylistically marked and subjective kind of meanings. Leech gives primacy to conceptual meaning because it has sophisticated organization based on the principle of contrastiveness and hierarchical structure.
E.g.
/P/ can be described as- voiceless + bilabial + plosive.
Similarly
Boy = + human + male-adult.
The hierarchical structure of ‘Boy’ = + Human + Male-Adult
Or “Boy” =Human – Male/Female-adult in a rough way.
Conceptual meaning is the literal meaning of the word indicating the idea or concept to which it refers. The concept is minimal unit of meaning which could be called ‘sememe’. As we define phoneme on the basis of binary contrast, similarly we can define sememe ‘Woman’ as = + human + female + adult. If any of these attribute changes the concept cease to be the same.
Conceptual meaning deals with the core meaning of expression. It is the denotative or literal meaning. It is essential for the functioning of language. For example, a part of the conceptual meaning of ‘Needle” may be “thin”, “sharp” or “instrument”.
The organization of conceptual meaning is based on two structural principles- Contrastiveness and the principle of structure. The conceptual meanings can be studied typically in terms of contrastive features.
For example the word “woman” can be shown as:
Woman = + Human, -Male, + Adult”.
On the contrary, word
“Boy” can be realized as:-
“Boy = “+ human, + male, - Adult”.
By the principle of structure, larger units of language are built up out smaller units or smaller units or smaller units are built out larger ones.
The aim of conceptual meaning is to provide an appropriate semantic representation to a sentence or statement. A sentence is made of abstract symbols. Conceptual meaning helps us to distinguish one meaning from the meaning of other sentences. Thus, conceptual meaning is an essential part of language. A language essentially depends on conceptual meaning for communication. The conceptual meaning is the base for all the other types of meaning.

2) Connotative Meaning:
Connotative meaning is the communicative value of an expression over and above its purely conceptual content. It is something that goes beyond mere referent of a word and hints at its attributes in the real world. It is something more than the dictionary meaning. Thus purely conceptual content of ‘woman’ is +human + female+ adult but the psychosocial connotations could be ‘gregarious’, ‘having maternal instinct’ or typical (rather than invariable) attributes of womanhood such as ‘babbling’,’ experienced in cookery’,skirt or dress wearing ‘etc. Still further connotative meaning can embrace putative properties of a referent due to viewpoint adopted by individual, group, and society as a whole. So in the past woman was supposed to have attributes like frail, prone to tears, emotional, irrigational, inconstant , cowardly etc. as well as more positive qualities such gentle, sensitive, compassionate, hardworking etc. Connotations vary age to age and society to society.
E.g. Old age ‘Woman’ - ‘Non-trouser wearing or sari wearing’ in Indian context must have seemed definite connotation in the past.
Present ‘Woman’---- Salwar/T-shirt/Jeans wearing.
Some times connotation varies from person to person also
. E.g. connotations of the word ‘woman’ for misogynist and a person of feminist vary.
The boundary between conceptual and connotative seems to be analogous. Connotative meaning is regarded as incidental, comparatively unstable, in determinant, open ended, variable according to age, culture and individual, whereas conceptual meaning is not like that . It can be codified in terms of limited symbols.

3) Social Meaning:
The meaning conveyed by the piece of language about the social context of its use is called the social meaning. The decoding of a text is dependent on our knowledge of stylistics and other variations of language. We recognize some words or pronunciation as being dialectical i.e. as telling us something about the regional or social origin of the speaker. Social meaning is related to the situation in which an utterance is used.
It is concerned with the social circumstances of the use of a linguistic expression. For example, some dialectic words inform us about the regional and social background of the speaker. In the same way, some stylistic usages let us know something of the social relationship between the speaker and the hearer
E.g. “I ain’t done nothing
The line tells us about the speaker and that is the speaker is probably a black American, underprivileged and uneducated. Another example can be
“Come on yaar, be a sport. Don’t be Lallu”
The social meaning can be that of Indian young close friends.
Stylistic variation represents the social variation. This is because styles show the geographical region social class of the speaker. Style helps us to know about the period, field and status of the discourse. Some words are similar to others as far as their conceptual meaning is concerned. But they have different stylistic meaning. For example, ‘steed ’, ‘horse and ‘nag’ are synonymous. They all mean a kind of animal i.e. Horse. But they differ in style and so have various social meaning. ‘Steed’ is used in poetry; ‘horse’ is used in general, while ‘nag’ is slang. The word ‘Home’ can have many use also like domicile ( official), residence (formal) abode (poetic) , home (ordinary use).
Stylistic variation is also found in sentence. For example, two criminals will express the following sentence
“They chucked the stones at the cops and then did a bunk with the look”
(Criminals after the event)
But the same ideas will be revealed by the chief inspector to his officials by the following sentence.
“After casting the stones at the police, they abandoned with money.”
(Chief Inspector in an official report)
Thus through utterances we come to know about the social facts, social situation, class, region, and speaker-listener relations by its style and dialect used in sentences.
The illocutionary force of an utterance also can have social meaning. According to the social situation, a sentence may be uttered as request, an apology, a warning or a threat, for example, the sentence,
“I haven’t got a knife” has the common meaning in isolation. But the sentence uttered to waiter mean a request for a knife’
Thus we can understand that the connotative meaning plays a very vital role in the field of semantics and in understanding the utterances and sentences in different context.

4) Affective or Emotive Meaning:
For some linguists it refers to emotive association or effects of words evoked in the reader, listener. It is what is conveyed about the personal feelings or attitude towards the listener.
E.g. ‘home’ for a sailor/soldier or expatriate
and ‘mother’ for a motherless child, a married woman (esp. in Indian context) will have special effective, emotive quality.
In affective meaning, language is used to express personal feelings or attitude to the listener or to the subject matter of his discourse.
For Leech affective meaning refers to what is convey about the feeling and attitude of the speak through use of language (attitude to listener as well as attitude to what he is saying). Affective meaning is often conveyed through conceptual, connotative content of the words used
E.g. “you are a vicious tyrant and a villainous reprobation and I hate you”
Or “I hate you, you idiot”.
We are left with a little doubt about the speaker’s feelings towards the listener. Here speaker seems to have a very negative attitude towards his listener. This is called affective meaning.
But very often we are more discreet (cautious) and convey our attitude indirectly.
E.g. “I am terribly sorry but if you would be so kind as to lower your voice a
little”
. Conveys our irritation in a scaled down manner for the sake of politeness. Intonation and voice quality are also important here. Thus the sentence above can be uttered in biting sarcasm and the impression of politeness maybe reversed while –
e.g.
“Will you belt up?”- can be turned into a playful remark between intimates if said with the intonation of a request.
Words like darling, sweetheart or hooligan, vandal have inherent emotive quality and they can be used neutrally.
I.A. Richards argued that emotive meaning distinguishes literature or poetic language from factual meaning of science. Finally it must be noted that affective meaning is largely a parasitic category. It overlaps heavily with style, connotation and conceptual content.

5) Reflected Meaning:
Reflected meaning and collocative meaning involve interconnection At the lexical level of language, Reflected meaning arises when a word has more than one conceptual meaning or multiple conceptual meaning. In such cases while responding to one sense of the word we partly respond to another sense of the word too. Leech says that in church service ‘the comforter and the Holy Ghost ’refer to the third in Trinity. They are religious words. But unconsciously there is a response to their non-religious meanings too. Thus the ‘comforter’ sounds warm and comforting while the ‘Ghost’ sounds ‘awesome’ or even ‘dreadful’. One sense of the word seems to rub off on another especially through relative frequency and familiarity (e.g. a ghost is more frequent and familiar in no religious sense.).
In poetry too we have reflected meaning as in the following lines from ‘Futility’
‘Are limbs so dear achieved, are sides,
Full nerved still warm-too hard to stir’
Owen here uses ‘dear’ in the sense of expensiveness. - But the sense of beloved is also eluded.
E.g. Daffodils
“The could not but be gay
In such jocund company”
The word ‘gay’ was frequently used in the time of William Wordsworth but the word now is used for ‘homosexuality’.
In such type cases of multiple meaning, one meaning of the word pushes the other meaning to the background. Then the dominant suggestive power of that word prevails. This may happen because of the relative frequency or familiarity of the dominant meaning. This dominant meaning which pushes the other meaning at the background is called the reflected meaning.
Reflected meaning is also found in taboo words. For examples are terms like erection, intercourse, ejaculation. The word ‘intercourse’ immediately reminds us of its association with sex (sexual intercourse). The sexual association of the word drives away its innocent sense, i.e. ‘communication’. The taboo sense of the word is so dominant that its non-taboo sense almost dies out. In some cases, the speaker avoids the taboo words and uses their alternative word in order to avoid the unwanted reflected meaning. For example, as Bloomfield has pointed out, the word ‘Cock’ is replaced by speakers, they use the word ‘rooster’ to indicate the general meaning of the word and avoid its taboo sense. These words have non-sexual meanings too. (E.g. erection of a building, ejaculate-throw out somebody) but because of their frequency in the lit of the physiology of sex it is becoming difficult to use them in their innocent/nonsexual sense.
Thus we can see that reflected meaning has great importance in the study of semantics.

6) Collocative Meaning:
Collocative meaning is the meaning which a word acquires in the company of certain words. Words collocate or co-occur with certain words only e.g. Big business not large or great.Collocative meaning refers to associations of a word because of its usual or habitual co-occurrence with certain types of words. ‘Pretty’ and ‘handsome’ indicate ‘good looking’.
However, they slightly differ from each other because of collocation or co-occurrence. The word ‘pretty’ collocates with – girls, woman, village, gardens, flowers, etc.
On the other hand, the word ‘handsome’ collocates with – ‘boys’ men, etc. so ‘pretty woman’ and ‘handsome man’. While different kinds of attractiveness, hence ‘handsome woman’ may mean attractive but in a mannish way. The verbs ‘wander’ and ‘stroll’ are quasi-synonymous- they may have almost the same meaning but while ‘cows may wonder into another farm’, they don’t stroll into that farm because ‘stroll’ collocates with human subject only. Similarly one ‘trembles with fear’ but ‘quivers with excitement’. Collocative meanings need to be invoked only when other categories of meaning don’t apply. Generalizations can be made in case of other meanings while collocative meaning is simply on idiosyncratic property of individual words. Collocative meaning has its importance and it is a marginal kind of category.

7) Thematic Meaning:
It refers to what is communicated by the way in which a speaker or a writer organizes the message in terms of ordering focus and emphasis .Thus active is different from passive though its conceptual meaning is the same. Various parts of the sentence also can be used as subject, object or complement to show prominence. It is done through focus, theme (topic) or emotive emphasis. Thematic meaning helps us to understand the message and its implications properly. For example, the following statements in active and passive voice have same conceptual meaning but different communicative values.
e.g.
1) Mrs. Smith donated the first prize
2) The first prize was donated by Mrs. Smith.
In the first sentence “who gave away the prize “is more important, but in the second sentence “what did Mrs. Smith gave is important”. Thus the change of focus change the meaning also.
The first suggests that we already know Mrs. Smith (perhaps through earlier mention) its known/given information while it’s new information.


Alternative grammatical construction also gives thematic meaning. For example,
1) He likes Indian good most.
2) Indian goods he likes most
3) It is the Indian goods he likes most.
Like the grammatical structures, stress and intonation also make the message prominent. For example, the contrastive stress on the word ‘cotton’ in the following sentence give prominence to the information
  1. John wears a cotton shirt
  2. The kind of shirt that john wears is cotton one.
Thus sentences or pairs of sentences with similar conceptual meaning differ their communicative value. This is due to different grammatical constructions or lexical items or stress and intonations. Therefore they are used in different contents.
“Ten thousand saw I at a glance”
Wordsworth here inverts the structure to focus on ‘ten thousand”
.
Sometimes thematic contrast i.e. contrasts between given and new information can be conveyed by lexical means.
e.g.

1) John owns the biggest shop in London

2) The biggest shop in London belongs to John.
The ways we order our message also convey what is important and what not. This is basically thematic meaning.
Associative Meaning:
Leech uses this as an umbrella term for the remaining 5 types of meanings( connotative, social, affective, reflective and collocative).All these have more in common with connotative than conceptual meaning. They all have the same open ended, variable character and can be analyzed in terms of scales or ranges ( more/less) than in either or contrastive terms. These meanings contain many imponderable factors. But conceptual meaning is stable

Summary of Seven Types of Meaning.
1. Conceptual Meaning = Logical, cognitive or connotative content.
2. Connotative Meaning = What is communicated by virtue of what language
refers
3. Social Meaning = What is communicated of the social circumstances of
Language
4. Affective Meaning = What is communicated of the feelings and attitudes of
the Speaker through language.
5. Reflected Meaning = What is communicated through associations with
another Sense of the same world.
6. Collocative Meaning = What is communicated through associations with
words which co-occur with another word.
7. Thematic Meaning = What is communicated by the way in which the
message is organized in terms of order and emphasis.

 
Semantics Examples
Multiple Meanings
One part of studying a language is knowing the many meanings of individual words. Here are some examples of words with more than one meaning:
  • A water pill at first glance could be a pill with water in it; but, it is understood to be a diuretic that causes a person to lose water from his body.
  • Crash can mean auto accident, a drop in the Stock Market, to attend a party without being invited, ocean waves hitting the shore or the sound of a cymbals being struck together.
  • A child’s alphabet block could be described as a wooden cube, learning aid, toy or block.
  • Some see the glass half empty and others see the glass half full.

  • A flowering plant could be referred to as a weed or a garden flower.



https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~rthomaso/documents/general/what-is-semantics.html 
http://universeofenglish.blogspot.co.id/2009/02/seven-types-of-meaning-in-semantics.html 
 Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-semantics.html#STOxpiMoGJcMcrUE.99